The average company is carrying millions in unquantified AI exposure -- sitting on the balance sheet, unnamed, until someone does the arithmetic. Your consultants bill by the report. We bill by the number.
| Risk | Category | Severity | Owner | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk | Severity | Score | Status | ||
Prompt injection Client Copilot | critical | 84 | Open | ||
Training-data provenance Underwriting Model | high | 71 | In review | ||
Model drift Fraud Scoring Engine | high | 68 | Open | ||
Explainability gap Credit Decisioning | high | 63 | Open | ||
Bias in CV screening TalentAI | medium | 52 | Mitigating | ||
Vendor sub-processor DocSummary API | low | 38 | Accepted |
Most AI governance work is sold as a deliverable: a 200-slide assessment, a framework, a dashboard. The artefacts multiply. The questions go unanswered. The bill arrives anyway.
Our position is that the only governance output that survives a board meeting is a number. Not a framework. Not a maturity curve. A number -- with a stated range, sourced lines, and a confidence the room can interrogate. Anything else is colour.
We built Govscape because the firms doing this work are paid to produce reports, not answers. The incentive is to lengthen, not to land. We are the opposite of that: a fixed scope, a working paper, and a number that closes.
Every figure on the page that follows is calculated from a published method. The method is challengeable. The lines are sourced. If a line cannot be defended, it is not on the ledger. That is the whole product.
Every governance gap maps to a financial pillar. Every pillar carries a calculated range and a stated confidence -- together they sum to the exposure sitting on your balance sheet today.
A 600-person professional services firm. Three productive AI use cases. A patchwork of policies. The kind of organisation that tells its board governance is “in flight”.
Every line is sourced. Every range is challengeable. The board paper is fifteen pages and survives questioning. That is the deliverable.
A sixty-second taste of the Cost Assessment your board would see. Answer a handful of questions and get an instant exposure range across all four pillars. Nothing is saved -- every figure is calculated in your browser and discarded.
A directional estimate, not a quote. We don't store anything you enter here -- the full assessment models 30+ inputs line by line.
A focused two-week discovery. We sit with your operations, technology, finance, and risk leads. We read the existing policies, the open audit findings, and the last four board packs. We leave with the inputs, not the answers.
Two weeks of modelling. Every line is calculated from a published method. Every figure carries a sourced range and a stated confidence. The output is a working paper your board can read on a Sunday night.
Optional. Where you want help closing the gaps the assessment surfaced, we scope a fixed-price remediation against the working paper. We do not sell the assessment to sell the remediation. The first stands on its own.
A clean, archival interface for consultants managing multiple clients. Real-time compliance status, gap tracking, and evidence management -- the same view your CFO reads on a Sunday night.
Where regulators read the working papers, not the dashboard.
Where AI use cases meet patient data and the margin for error is zero.
Where every AI-assisted decision must survive discovery, privilege, and the duty of care.
Where governance is the product, and clients increasingly ask to see yours.
Average quantified exposure surfaced · £2.4M per assessment
If the math is worth talking about, we should talk.
Tell us about your organisation. We'll arrange a thirty-minute call and bring a worked example built on public information about your sector.
Get in touch →Thirty-minute call. No deck. No discovery questionnaire. We bring a worked example built on public information about your sector. You decide whether the math is worth talking about.
We'll come back with a focused next step within one working day.